Konferenz: "Relational Injustice"

Home | Kontakt | English
Home » Events und Aktivitäten » Events und Aktivitäten Archiv » Konferenz: "Relational Injustice"
 

20.-21. Juni 2013

Konferenz: "Relational Injustice"

Hosted by the Centre of Advanced Studies "Justitia Amplificata" Goethe University of Frankfurt (funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)

Organisatoren

Sean Aas, James Gledhill, Sarah Goff, and Mara Marin

Redner

Ann Cudd (University of Kansas), Joseph Heath (University of Toronto), Aaron James (UC Irvine), A. J. Julius (UCLA), Lionel McPherson (Tufts University), and Richard Miller (Cornell)

Ort

Forschungskolleg Humanwissenschaften, Bad Homburg (http://www.forschungskolleg-humanwissenschaften.de/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=36&Itemid=105&lang=de)

Workshop

There is no shortage of ideals of justice. However, endorsing a particular conception of ideal justice does not necessarily help us to understand actual injustice in its diverse forms. This conference is motivated by the belief that theorizing about injustice can bring a new set of perspectives to the critique and transformation of relations between individuals, groups and states.  This is a fruitful time for theorizing about injustice. A convergence can be detected between the traditions of analytic political theory and critical theory. Contemporary critical theory has increasingly adopted the language of justice and injustice in undertaking social critique. Meanwhile, recent developments within analytic political theory have seen attention turn from constructing ideals of just social relations to a focus on understanding manifest injustices. However, many questions remain unanswered: to what extent does the identification of injustice presuppose an ideal of justice? How can economics and social science better inform normative theory with a practical intent? Does a change in focus from justice to injustice go far enough, or is an enlarged conceptual repertoire required in order to come to terms with today’s social ills? This conference aims to combine theoretical insights from the traditions of analytic political philosophy and critical social theory to achieve a better understanding of injustice. Relevant themes include: unfairness, exploitation, coercion, oppression, domination, misrecognition, and alienation. In exploring these themes, it surely will be helpful to examine and critique real world injustices. Real world issues of particular interest include discrimination, racism, economic marginalization, and trade and finance.

Programm

Thursday, June 20

13:00-13:15: Welcome and Introduction

13:15-15:15 Historical Injustice

Lionel McPherson: How Not to "Correct" Historical Injustice

A.J. Julius: Antislavery

Chair: Katrin Flikschuh

15:15 - Coffee Break

16:00-18:00 Just Relations

Richard Miller: Injustice as Selfishness

James Gledhill: The Basic Structure of the Institutional Imagination

Chair: Thomas Christiano

18:00 - BBQ at the Forschungskolleg


Friday, June 21

10:00-12:00 Structures and Oppression

Ann Cudd: Domestic Violence as Relational Injustice: Gendered Relationships in Oppressive Social Structures

Mara Marin: What is Structural about the Basic Structure?

Chair: Stefan Gosepath

12:00 - Lunch

13:30-15:30 Global Economic Life

Aaron James: Fortune and Fairness in Global Economic Life

Sarah Goff: Aid Conditionality: Two Defensible Approaches

Chair: Darrel Moellendorf

15:30 - Coffee Break

16:15-18:15 Best and Second Best

Joseph Heath: Efficiency as the Implicit Morality of the Market

Sean Aas: Just Enough?

Chair: Rainer Forst

18:15-18:30: Closing Remarks

 

Attendance of the workshop is free. Registration is required for organization and catering purposes by June 14.
Places are limited, and will be assigned on a first come, first serve basis.
In order to register, please contact Ms Valérie Bignon: [email protected]

In the interest of maximizing time for open conversation, the papers will be circulated in advance, the conference participants will be expected to have read them, and authors to only introduce the main lines of argument.